|
1
|
- Sue Colson
- Cedar Key Aquaculture Association, Inc.
- City of Cedar Key
- Leslie N. Sturmer
- UF / IFAS Shellfish Aquaculture
Extension
|
|
2
|
- Initiated in 1990s as a result of job retraining programs for
under-employed oyster harvesters and net fishermen
- Created and driven by local efforts, “bottom up” approach
- Has brought economic revitalization to area
- Over 200 clam farms with
sales value of $10M (2003)
- Impact of $22M (1999)
- Proactive clam growers association, formed in 2000, addressing many
issues
|
|
3
|
- Originally regulatory oversight complex, many agencies involved
- Monumental state laws, supported by local efforts, passed in 1996-8
fostering aquaculture
- Aquaculture IS agriculture
- Shellfish aquaculture in public interest
- All regulatory responsibility transferred to Department of Agriculture
& Consumer Services
- Certificate of registration
- BMPs in lieu of traditional permitting process
- Division of Aquaculture created within DACS in 1999
|
|
4
|
- Industry grows as does size of support facilities
- Specifically, aquaculture docks exceed 1000 ft2
- DEP receives complaints about aquaculture docks from citizens
- DACS puts a hold on approving docks
- DEP begins inspecting other upland facilities (land-based nurseries,
wholesalers’ plants)
- DACS receives complaints from citizens about use of net dips on clam
bags
- DACS waffles on approving net dip products
- DACS makes multiple changes to lease policies and increases fees administratively without
industry input
|
|
5
|
- Lack of Communication
- DACS and DEP do not communicate amongst themselves on perceived
problems, resulting in gridlock and concerns of industry management
- Industry does not communicate amongst themselves and with citizens in
community, resulting in “finger pointing”
- DACS does not communicate with industry about issues pertaining to
their livelihood, resulting in lack of trust and uncertainty in
businesses
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- DACS and DEP interface
- Use of net dips on clam bags
- Lease changes
- Establishing communication
- with DACS
|
|
8
|
- Round table discussion with local field reps
- CKAA* Board of Directors
- Clam farmers
- City officials
- IFAS Shellfish Extension
- DEP identifies issues by providing pictures of problem areas
- Each issue is discussed
- Regulatory authority clarified in some issues
- Water discharges
- Mangrove cutting
|
|
9
|
- CKAA and IFAS provide answers
- Educate DEP and city officials on shell recovery efforts
- Volunteer program
- Newly funded project in which shell is collected at wholesale plants
- Educate wholesalers on programs
and issue of dumping shell below MHW mark
- Educate public
|
|
10
|
- DACS lacks statutory authority
on issuing docks for aquaculture
- CKAA and IFAS seek solution
- Initiate “law” making with local legislative delegation
- Assist in lobbying efforts and
partner with
- Florida Aquaculture Association
- Florida Farm Bureau
- “Glitch” bill attached to HB 955
in 2005 session passes
- Effective January 1, 2006
- DACS begins accepting requests for aquaculture docks
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|